Authors

Abstract

As artificial intelligence becomes more integrated into clinical decision support (CDS) systems, the risk of perpetuating or even amplifying existing health disparities becomes a critical concern. Algorithmic bias, often stemming from unrepresentative or historically skewed training data, can lead to inequitable care for minority populations. This paper provides a comprehensive review of state-of-the-art methodologies for identifying and mitigating bias in medical AI. We analyze pre-processing techniques (e.g., data augmentation, re-sampling), in-processing methods (e.g., adversarial debiasing, fairness constraints), and post-processing adjustments (e.g., fairness-aware calibration). We then propose a novel, hybrid framework for developing fair and equitable CDS tools. This framework emphasizes transparency, model interpretability, and continuous auditing. We argue that ensuring ethical AI is not merely a technical challenge but a socio-technical one, requiring collaboration between data scientists, clinicians, ethicists, and regulatory bodies to build systems that all patients can trust.

Keywords
Phishing Detection Random Forest Machine Learning Cybersecurity Classification Outlier Removal
Share Article
Downloads
Details
DOI
Published
2025-07-28
Abstract Views
113
PDF Downloads
60
Section
Articles
License

Copyright (c) 2025 Eva Carter, Finn Mitchell, Gina Perez (Author)

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.